Define the case and the decision
Agree the review boundary, applicable requirements, evidence needs and responsible people. Name who performs corrective work and who can independently review it.
HOW IT WORKS
One review. A connected chain of evidence.
Define the scope, inspect the source material, resolve findings and independently re-verify the correction. Preserve the accepted context in a frozen record.
ONE CASE. A CONNECTED RECORD.
From first evidence to a defensible handover.
Keep the source, the corrective work and the independent decision connected throughout the review.
CASE RECORD
Electrical installation review
Review in progress
Every finding has a source.
A reviewer can open the exact evidence version behind the finding.
- Installation drawingRevision 03 · Source recorded
- Inspection photographRevision 01 · Source recorded
- Test certificateMissing · Evidence requested
FINDING F-001
Test evidence is incomplete.
Independent review required
The correction keeps its history.
New evidence is linked to the original finding without replacing the earlier record.
- Finding F-001Corrective evidence attached
- Test certificateRevision 02 · Linked to F-001
- Independent reviewerAssigned · Review pending
REVIEW HANDOFF
Correction and verification are separate steps.
Illustrative closure
Preserve what was reviewed.
A frozen record retains the evidence and review context used for that decision.
- Independent reviewRecorded for this example
- Frozen reportEvidence & rule versions pinned
- Verification recordIntegrity check recorded
CASE HISTORY
A verifiable record of this review.
Missing material remains an open question.
Workflow illustration, not customer results. Your pilot validates the agreed path with real evidence.
Connect evidence to findings
Run checks against the selected rule versions. Inspect the source behind each finding and keep missing or uncertain evidence visible. AI assists the review; people make the accountable decisions.
Correct and independently re-verify
Link corrective evidence to the original finding. A separately authorised reviewer evaluates the revised material and records the result. An unresolved item remains open.
Freeze the reviewed context
Preserve the accepted evidence and rule versions with the review record. Verify the frozen record’s integrity. Later changes can require a new current review without erasing that history.
YOUR FIRST CASE
What does your next review need to prove?
Bring the case, the evidence and the people responsible for the decision. We will work through the scope together.